It is obvious from the NMR spectrum that all of the signals from the color coded protons are doubled in the spectrum. One possible explanation for this is that there is a slow rotation about the ruthenium carbon bond indicated with the red curly arrow allowing for two possible nonequivalent rotamers. This is confirmed with the 2D 1H NOESY spectrum shown in the figure below with a 0.9 second mixing time. The spectrum clearly shows exchange peaks between corresponding pairs of 1H signals from each rotamer.
The interesting thing to note from the NOESY spectrum is that each aromatic proton (pink) from a single rotamer shows NOE correlations to the methyl groups (blue and yellow) of both rotamers - not just those from a single rotamer. With this data, it is not possible to assign the subspectrum of a single rotamer. Presumably, the assignment could be made by collecting a 2D NOESY spectrum at low temperature where the rotation was completely frozen out or by collecting a 2D NOESY spectrum with a very short mixing time where the rotation would be limited. The problem with the former approach is that the solvent may freeze at a temperature too high to stop the bond rotation. The problem with the latter approach is that the NOE's would be much reduced due to the short mixing time and collecting a 2D data set with sufficient signal to noise ratio would take a great deal of time. Another approach is to collect selective 1D gradient NOESY spectra with selective excitation of the aromatic proton from each rotamer individually. These data are shown in the figure below for two different mixing times.
Each spectrum is displayed in two parts. The left-hand panel is the aromatic region with the selectively excited resonance colored red and the right-hand panel is the aliphatic region showing the NOE correlations to the methyl groups. From the spectra collected with a 2 second mixing time, one can see that the selective excitation is no longer selective due to bond rotation during the long mixing time. One can see inverted peaks for the aromatic protons of both rotamers despite the fact that the 1H signal of only one rotamer was selectively excited. Furthermore, NOEs to the methyl signals from both rotamers are present. The spectra collected with only a 0.2 second mixing time, on the other hand, show very selective excitation. The time scale of the bond rotation is obviously longer than the 0.2 second mixing time. The spectra show only the NOEs between the selectively excited aromatic proton and the methyl groups from a single rotamer. The NOEs build up fast enough to be observed during the 0.2 second mixing time before rotation occurs. These data allow for the assignment of signals from each of the rotamers.Thank you to Justin Lummiss of Dr. Fogg's research group for aharing this interesting system.
The bottom trace is a 13C 
This technique has been cleverly applied* to mixtures of molecules immersed in viscous oils where intra-molecular correlations are observed whereas inter-molecular correlations are not observed. The data allow for the observation of the constituent components of complex mixtures.
The resolution profile during a fill may be different for every magnet. For this particular magnet, it is advisable not to collect high resolution data for at least 90 minutes after a nitrogen refill.

The figure consists of simulations of X in an AA'X spin system as a function of JAA' with JAX set at 10 Hz and no coupling between A' and X. Clearly, the spectrum of X is affected by the coupling between A and A'. When JAA' = 0, a first order doublet is observed with a coupling constant of 10 Hz. As JAA' increases, complicated second order multiplets are observed. When JAA' = 50 Hz (or more) a "virtual triplet" with a coupling constant of 5 Hz is observed. This appears to be identical to a 1:2:1 triplet in a first order spectrum with a coupling constant of 1/2 JAX. It is however a second order spectrum and should not be misinterpreted as first order weak coupling. An example of this is illustrated in the figure below.
The figure shows the 13C NMR signals for the ipso and ortho aromatic carbons of 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (DPPE). These carbon atoms are coupled to the nearest phosphorus but not to the remote phosphorus. The two phosphorus atoms are strongly coupled to one another. The ortho carbons appear as a "virtual triplet" and the ipso carbons, a second order multiplet.

where Io is the intensity of B with no saturation of A, and I∞ , is the intensity of B when A is saturated for an infinite time. The saturation transfer effect is useful for situations where the exchange is slow on 





It should also be noted that the overall intensity of the acetone signal decreases with respect to the chloroform signal as a function of the pulse duration due to the width of the 

A sample of toluene and H2O/D2O was prepared. As these two liquids are immiscible, the sample is layered with the less dense toluene on top and the more dense water on the bottom. The bottom trace in the figure shows a conventional 1H NMR spectrum. Since the pulse used to collect the spectrum was a hard 90° pulse with a wide 
The left-hand portion of the figure shows equilibrium magnetization vectors being rotated by radio frequency pulses. 90° pulses along the x, y, -x and -y axes rotate the z magnetization vector to the -y, x, y and -x axes of the rotating frame, respectively according to the right-hand screw rule. After the pulse, the magnetization vector rotates in the rotating frame of reference at a frequency equal to the difference between the transmitter frequency and the frequency of the NMR resonance. In the figure, the magnetization is assumed to be rotating anti-clockwise representing an NMR resonance with a positive frequency with respect to the transmitter frequency. The NMR spectrometer measures the time dependent voltages on two of the four orthogonal axes of the rotating frame separated by 90° (