University of Ottawa NMR Facility Web Site

Please feel free to make suggestions for future posts by emailing Glenn Facey.

Monday, July 28, 2008

T2 vs T2*

The T2 relaxation time is the exponential decay constant for transverse magnetization (i.e. magnetization in the xy plane). In principle, one should be able to measure the T2 relaxation time by applying a 90 degree pulse to create transverse magnetization and measuring the decay constant of the FID. In reality however, the decay rate of the FID is also affected by such things as magnetic field homogeneity, unresolved coupling, temperature gradients.....etc. Because of these effects, the decay constant of the FID is called T2* rather than T2. T2* is an instrumentally dependant parameter and it determines the line width of an NMR resonance. T2, on the other hand, is a physically meaningful parameter independent of field inhomogeneity, J coupling and other factors. It is measured with a 90-tau-180-tau-FID pulse sequence as a function of tau. T2 is always greater than or equal to T2*. The figure below compares T2 to T2* for the proton resonance of CHCl3 for the lineshape sample in a reasonably well shimmed 300 MHz magnet. The line shape specifications were 0.3 Hz (at 50%), 2.9 Hz (at 0.55 %) and 6.2 Hz (at 0.11%). Even in a well shimmed magnet, the T2 for CHCl3 is nearly 19 times longer than the T2*.


Luke O'Dell said...

So what about T1 and T1-rho?

Glenn Facey said...

Hi Luke,


See BLOG entries for October 31/07 and November 7/07.

T1 and T1-rho may be the subjects of future BLOG posts.


Ластоногий said...

Hi Glenn,
You rote that T2 time is measured with 90-tau-180-tau-FID pulse.
Why there is an FID in the end? Maybe you meant 90-tau-180-tau-ECHO?

Glenn Facey said...

I wrote that T2 is "...measured with a 90-tau-180-tau-FID pulse sequence ....." And yes, it would be more correct to say " ....measured with a 90-tau-180-tau-ECHO pulse sequence...." .