University of Ottawa NMR Facility Web Site

Please feel free to make suggestions for future posts by emailing Glenn Facey.

Monday, December 16, 2013

Echoes, T2 Measurements and Diffusion

In a perfectly homogeneous magnetic field, the T2 relaxation time constant can be measured directly from the free induction decay in the time domain or the full width at half height of the resonance in the frequency domain.  The magnetic field however, is never perfectly homogeneous.  Each microscopic volume element of the sample resides in a slightly different magnetic field and therefore the offset frequencies of the resonance in each volume element are slightly different from one another.  The net effect on the spectrum of the entire sample is that the NMR resonances are broader than what one would expect from the T2 relaxation process alone.  The distribution of offset frequencies due to magnetic field inhomogeneity is referred to as inhomogeneous broadening.  In an inhomogeneous magnetic field, the FID decays faster, with time constant T2* where 1/T2* has a contribution from the natural relaxation rate, 1/T2, of the resonance and that due to the field inhomogeneity.  In other words, when a sample is in an inhomogeneous magnetic field, the resonances are homogeneously broadened by the natural T2 relaxation process and inhomogeneously broadened by the non-uniform magnetic field.  The measurement of T2 relies on separating the homogeneous broadening from the inhomogeneous broadening.

One of the first pulse sequences typically introduced in NMR textbooks is the spin echo or Hahn echo.  This sequence consists of a 90° pulse followed by a delay, τ, during which offsets frequencies evolve.  A 180° pulse is then applied after which another period of time, τ is allowed where offsets continue to evolve, producing an echo at 2τ. The spin echo sequence has the ability to refocus the distribution of offset frequencies due to magnetic field inhomogeneity (inhomogeneous broadening) however it cannot refocus the natural distribution of frequencies due to the T2 relaxation process (homogeneous broadening).  It would seem as if the spin echo sequence has the ability to separate out the homogeneous broadening from the inhomogeneous broadening and therefore should be able to be used to measure the T2 relaxation time constant in a scheme like the one shown in the figure below.

where the intensity of the signals as a function of 2τ is fitted to an exponential decay to give T2.  Can this sequence really be used to measure T2?  Let's look a bit deeper.

A sample of tetrakis-trimethylsilyl silane ( Si(Si(CH3)3)4 ) was dissolved in CDCl3.  The magnet was shimmed such that the full line width at half height of the 1H resonance was 2 Hz.  A standard one-pulse proton spectrum and a Hahn echo spectrum (with τ set to 1 second) were collected.  The same measurements were made after adjusting the magnetic field shims such that the full width at half height was 5 Hz and 13 Hz.  The results are shown in the figure below.

The top panel shows the NMR spectra resulting from the one-pulse measurement.  The spectra all have the same integrated area as expected.  The middle panel shows the FID's from the one-pulse measurements.  The initial intensity of each FID is the same since the initial intensity of the FID is proportional to the integrated area of the resonance in the frequency domain.  The bottom panel shows the Hahn echoes collected with a value of τ =1 second (a value substantially shorter than T2).  The receiver was turned on immediately after the 180° pulse to collect the entire echo.  Unlike the one-pulse FID's which remained constant as a function of magnetic field inhomogeneity, the height of the Hahn echoes decreased as the magnetic field inhomogeneity increased, all other parameters being constant.  This should convince you that the simple Hahn echo is not always suitable for T2 measurements as the intensity of the echo depends on the degree of inhomogeneous broadening.  This is so because of molecular diffusion.  During the one second τ delays, molecules move from one volume element to another in the sample and therefore change their offset frequencies over the course of the measurement.  The net result for the entire sample leads a loss in echo intensity due to destructive interference in the time domain signal from the sum of all volume elements.  The loss in echo intensity is worse the more inhomogeneous the field.  The simple Hahn echo would be expected to work as a means to measure T2 only in cases where the diffusion is insignificant with respect to τ (solids or dissolved macromolecules). 

How then are T2's measured for small molecules in solution where diffusion is fast?  One uses a train of Hahn echoes where the τ delays for each echo are chosen sufficiently short such that diffusion is not a problem (typically on the order of msec or tens of msec).  The T2 is calculated from a series of spectra collected as a function of the number of echoes in the train based on the overall time between the initial 90° pulse and the collection of the signal.  Such a scheme is called a Carr Purcell Meiboom Gill (CPMG) sequence and is shown in the figure below.


Julian Haigh said...

Can T2 be calculated from the signal intensity of each FID recorded for each echo of the last pulse sequence in your CPMG figure?


Glenn Facey said...

Hi Julian,

Thank you for the question. The answer is Yes.


ambrish said...

Hi Glenn,

Can T2 of water proton in 90%H2O+10%D2O sample be calculated using Bruker standard CPMG pulse?
Will radiation dumping affect T2 relaxation of water proton? What pulse program should I use for T2 calculation of water proton in 90%H2O+10%D2O.



Glenn Facey said...

I really do not know the answer to your question. My feeling is that the CPMG method should work fine provided you use the integrals for analysis rather than signal height. You can confirm this by repeating your measurement in using a probe with a much lower Q where radiation damping is not an issue.

Unknown said...

I Glenn,
Which sequence gives the more accurate value of T2 to satisfy the relation with the line width?D=1/(pi*T2).
Thanks a lot

Glenn Facey said...

It is best to use the sequence with the CPMG echo train.

Anonymous said...

Hi Glen,

What is the reasonable 'Tau' value (which is constant) between a 90deg and the 180deg pulse in case of CPMG echo train sequence for T2 measurements? I just need the minimum and maximum values of it for different samples if possible. Also, how to cross-check whether the measured T2 value for a certain sample is right or wrong? Thank you so much in advance.

best wishes,

Glenn Facey said...

One should choose values of tau which are at least 10 times the duration of the 180 deg pulse and short enough such that the diffusion during tau is not significant. For macromolecules tau can be quite large (hundreds of msec to seconds). For small molecules tau should be chosen msec to tens of msec.

The only way I know to cross check the T2 is through a literature search. The measured T2 via CPMG must always be equal to or longer than that measured from the line width of the resonance (1/(pi*(width at half height))). It will also always be shorter than the T1.


Unknown said...

Can you please expand on how using en echo-train dismisses the effect of diffusion.
After all, even in the echo train sequence the molecules are still moving through the sample, so why won't we see the same signal loss X milliseconds into the echo-train as at a Hahn-echo with \tau=x milliseconds?
Are the consecutive 180 pulses somehow preventing the molecules from moving too far?

Glenn Facey said...

The pulse sequence certainly doesn't prevent molecular motion. The losses due to diffusion are experienced during the tau delay periods. The diffusion losses are not additive from one tau period to another. Diffusion losses are thus reduced by using an echo train with short tau delays rather than repeated mesurements as a function of tau (with long tau).