When there is more than one signal, the FID is an
interferogram representing the sum of all time domain signals, each with a
different frequency. Since each
component has a different frequency, its phase is affected to a different
extent as a result of the dead time.
Higher frequency time domain components
(i.e. those representing peaks further off-resonance) are affected more
than lower frequency components (i.e. those representing peaks closer to being
on-resonance). This is illustrated in
the figure below for the 1H NMR data for p-xylene. The left-hand portion of top panel of the figure
shows the FID containing both methyl and aromatic components while the right-hand
portion of the top panel shows an expansion of the initial portion of the same FID. The bottom panel of the figure shows a stacked
plot of the NMR spectra collected as a function of dead time. One can see that the phase of the aromatic
peak furthest off-resonance is affected to a greater extent by an increased
dead time than the methyl peak closer to resonance.
The last figure also shows a stacked plot of the 1H NMR spectra of p-xylene as a function of dead time.
In this case, the methyl signal was set on-resonance. One notices immediately that the phase of the on-resonance methyl peak is unaffected by an increase in the dead time whereas that of the off-resonance aromatic peak is severely affected. The on-resonance methyl peak is not affected by an increase in dead time as its time domain signal is a simple exponential with no sine/cosine oscillations. A loss of the beginning of a simple exponential FID due to the dead time still leaves a simple exponential and thus the phase is not affected.
The last figure also shows a stacked plot of the 1H NMR spectra of p-xylene as a function of dead time.
In this case, the methyl signal was set on-resonance. One notices immediately that the phase of the on-resonance methyl peak is unaffected by an increase in the dead time whereas that of the off-resonance aromatic peak is severely affected. The on-resonance methyl peak is not affected by an increase in dead time as its time domain signal is a simple exponential with no sine/cosine oscillations. A loss of the beginning of a simple exponential FID due to the dead time still leaves a simple exponential and thus the phase is not affected.
4 comments:
Dear Glenn Facey,
I acquired an Al27 NMR on my sample. The spinning speed is 27.5KHz. Dwell time is 0.8us. Deadtime is 8us. I lost some FID points at the beginning of my signal. And now it's hard to phase my spectra properly, especially the spinning sidebands. Could you please inspire me on how to phase it correctly?
Bottle,
Phasing and baseline problems are very common in solid-state NMR spectra acquired with short dwell times due to probe ringing or dead time problems. You can delete the bad points at the beginning of the FID and FT the it. Phase the intense centerband with zero-order phase correction and phase the sidebands with first order phase correction. The first order correction will likely be very large and will leave your spectrum with extreme baseline problems. These problems can be corrected with a baseline correction routine applied to the spectrum. You may have better luck by using backward linear prediction to predict the bad points in the FID. Another option is described in this post:
https://u-of-o-nmr-facility.blogspot.com/2007/11/baseline-correction-in-satellite.html
Essentially you delete all of the FID points up to the top of the first rotational echo then FT the FID. It should be easy to phase and the baseline should be acceptable. Of course, you throw away all of the information between the beginning of the FID and the first rotational echo. You may lose broad features in your spectrum.
Glenn
Hi, is there any formula that relates the phase change in the frequency domain with the time shift in the time domain? I've been playing around by cropping the initial points of the FID and noticed that for certain number of cropped points a zeroth order correction does the job, but in other cases one needs first order phase correction. I couldn't find any literature about this.
EF,
I’m not sure about a specific formula which would account for both the zero order and first order phase corrections as a function of the number of points removed from the beginning of an FID as the first order correction will depend on the observe pulse duration and how far off-resonance a peak is observed. Perhaps this post will help:
http://u-of-o-nmr-facility.blogspot.com/2011/01/first-order-phase-errors.html
Glenn
Post a Comment