Comparison of Broadband Decoupling Schemes

Many NMR measurements such as HSQC or HMQC rely on broadband X nucleus decoupling (X = ¹³C, ¹⁵N, ³¹P .... etc.)..  Broadband decoupling schemes, using conventional rectangular pulses (e.g GARP) require fairly high power levels leading to undesired sample heating.  They are also limited in their effective decoupling bandwidth.  Adiabatic decoupling schemes use shaped adiabatic pulses and have become more and more common over the last couple of decades due, in large part, to the flexibility of modern NMR instruments to generate shaped pulses.  Adiabatic decoupling schemes (e.g. WURST) use much less power than those using conventional rectangular pulses. thereby reducing or eliminating problems associated with sample heating.  Due to the lower power requirements and increased effectiveness over wider frequency ranges, adiabatic decoupling schemes are ideally suited for X nucleus decoupling at higher field strengths. The figure below shows 500 MHz ¹H [³¹P] NMR spectra measured with inverse gated decoupling for the P-CH₃ methyl resonance of dimethyl methylphosphonate  The single scan spectra were collected in a pseudo-2D fashion, as a function of the decoupler offset frequency from -256 ppm to +256 ppm from the ³¹P resonance frequency in 1 ppm steps.  The acquisition time and recycle time for each FID were 2 sec and 4 sec, respectively.   In the left-hand panel, broadband GARP decoupling was employed at a power of 1.22 W  (60 µsec 90° pulses).  In the right-hand panel, WURST decoupling was used at a peak power of 0.755 W (2 ms WURST pulses, bandwidth = 250 ppm).

Clearly, the data collected with WURST decoupling, at lower power, have a much larger decoupling range (250 ppm) compared to the data collected with GARP decoupling (98 ppm).  Furthermore, while the GARP data were collected, the sample temperature increased and had to be compensated for by the variable temperature unit.  No such temperature increase was observed while collecting  the WURST data.  It is also interesting to note that, in the case of GARP decoupling, distorted line shapes are observed just outside of the decoupling range, while for WURST decoupling, the spectra are fully coupled just outside of the decoupling range with a very sharp transition between being fully coupled and fully decoupled.  For broadband decoupling, WURST is best!   

Decoupling Bandwidth and Distorted Line Shapes

Broadband X nucleus decoupling (X = ¹³C, ¹⁵N, ³¹P, ¹¹B, ¹⁹F etc.....) is frequently used in ¹H detected 2D HSQC/HMQC data collection or in standard 1D ¹H spectra to aid in structure assignment.  When broadband decoupling schemes are used, one must keep in mind that they are not infinitely broadbanded.   They have finite bandwidths over which they are effective thus limiting the chemical shift range for the decoupled nuclide.  The effective bandwidth depends on the particular decoupling scheme and the decoupling power used.  If multiple peaks are to be decoupled, one must insure that all peaks are within the decoupler bandwidth.  One can determine experimentally the effective decoupling bandwidth by running a series of ¹H spectra varying the decoupler offset frequency.  Such a measurement is shown in the figure below for the P-CH₃ methyl resonance of dimethyl methylphosphonate. 300 MHz ¹H [³¹P] NMR spectra were collected in a pseudo-2D fashion, incrementing the decoupler offset frequency from 200 ppm to -200 ppm from the ³¹P resonance frequency in 1 ppm steps.  Broadband GARP decoupling was employed with a power of 3125 Hz  (80 µsec 90° pulses).  The pseudo-2D contour plot is shown in the left-hand panel and a stacked plot is shown in the right-hand panel.

One can see that the effective decoupling bandwidth is 15.56 kHz or 128 ppm on a 300 MHz instrument.  When the decoupler offset exceeds ±64 ppm from the ³¹P resonance frequency, one obtains distorted line shapes.  Representative distorted line shapes are shown in the figure below.  The bottom spectrum was collected with no ³¹P decoupling.  The top, fully decoupled spectrum was collected with on-resonance ³¹P GARP decoupling.  The middle spectra, highlighted in pink, are representative distorted spectra outside of the effective decoupling bandwidth.

If one is not aware of the decoupling offset and available bandwidth, one may obtain misleading line shapes subject to misinterpretation.

13C NMR with 1H and 31P Decoupling

NMR users are very familiar with the advantages of proton decoupling when observing ¹³C. The ¹³C NMR spectra of phosphorus containing compounds can be made simpler by applying ³¹P decoupling either on its own or in addition to proton decoupling. The figure below shows the ¹³C NMR spectrum of dimethyl methylphosphonate with all possible combinations of proton and ³¹P decoupling. The data collection required a triple resonance probe with the appropriate band pass filters.

31P Decoupling

All of you routinely use proton decoupling in your 31P NMR spectra, many of you without giving it a thought. Few people realize that it is a simple matter to decouple 31P in your 1H NMR spectra. This will allow you to determine which protons are coupled to phosphorus. An example of this is shown below. The lower trace is a standard 1H spectrum and the upper trace is a 1H spectrum with 31P decoupling.