Where is my INEPT signal? - Proton Exchange Issues

INEPT and DEPT sequences are routinely used to enhance the NMR signals for low γ nuclides such as ¹⁵N or ¹³C.  The enhancement relies on polarization transfer between the protons J-coupled and the low γ nuclide.  The pulse sequences incorporate delays based on the reciprocal of the J-coupling constant between the protons and the low γ nuclide.  In the case of ¹⁵N INEPT, the enhancement for each scan can be as much as γ_H/γ_N (~ 10) compared to that from a conventional one-pulse sequence with inverse gated decoupling.  Furthermore, the recycle delay for the INEPT sequence depends on the the ¹H T₁ relaxation time rather than that of ¹⁵N.  ¹H T₁'s are typically an order of magnitude (or more) less than those of ¹⁵N so the recycle delays required for ¹⁵N INEPT spectra are at least ten (and possibly 100 times) shorter than those required for one-pulse data collection.  These two factors mean that the true time saving for a ¹⁵N INEPT measurement compared to a one-pulse ¹⁵N measurement can be on the order of 100 - 1000 times.  There are, however cases where ¹⁵N INEPT signals are attenuated or entirely nonexistent.  Attenuated ¹⁵N INEPT signals are observed when the protons (with short T₁) coupled to ¹⁵N exchange with those of water (longer T₁) on a time scale of seconds.*  The problem arises because of saturation transfer during the inverse gated decoupling used during the acquisition time. The partially saturated protons are unable to transfer as much polarization to the ¹⁵N as they would were they fully polarized. The problem can be reduced if a recycle delay much greater than the T₁ relaxation time of the water protons is employed.  If the protons bound to ¹⁵N undergo exchange with other labile protons at a rate fast with respect to the ¹H-¹⁵N J coupling interaction, polarization transfer from ¹H to ¹⁵N is not possible and a ¹⁵N INEPT signal cannot be observed.  This is demonstrated in the figure below.

Concentrated solutions of the methyl ester of anthranilic acid and anthranilic acid were prepared in DMSO-d₆.  The ¹⁵N NMR data were collected on a 600 MHz instrument with a cryoprobe.  The left-hand panel of the figure compares the ¹⁵N one-pulse spectrum with inverse gated decoupling (bottom) to the INEPT spectrum (top) for the methyl ester.  The spectra were collected with the same number of scans. For the methyl ester, the ¹⁵N bound protons do not exchange with any other labile protons.  The enhancement in the ¹⁵N INEPT spectrum is clear.  Similar spectra for anthranilic acid are shown on the right-hand side of the figure.  In anthranilic acid, the ¹⁵N bound -NH₂ protons undergo intramolecular exchange with the acid proton at a rate fast with respect to the one-bond ¹⁵N-¹H coupling constant (~90 Hz).  As a result, polarization transfer is not possible and no INEPT signal is observed.  The same is true for the meta- and para- isomers (data not shown). 

Thank you to Jin Hong for sharing her experience with collecting ¹⁵N INEPT data for anthranilic acid and Mojmir Suchy for kindly providing the samples.

* G.D. Henry and B.D. Sykes, J. Magn. Reson. B, 102, 193 (1993).

CEST - Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer

Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) is a technique where one resonance, in slow exchange with a second resonance, is saturated with a selective low power pulse followed by a hard non-selective 90° pulse.  The intensity of the second resonance is then diminished due to the transfer of saturation from the first resonance as the result of  chemical exchange.  The figure below demonstrates this for a 25 mM solution of salicylic acid in H₂O/D₂O buffered at pH 7.

The left-hand panel of the figure is a stacked plot of extracted spectra collected in a pseudo 2D acquisition as a function of saturation frequency.  The saturation frequency was varied from an initial value of 20 ppm to a final value of -20 ppm in steps of 0.2 ppm.  The spectra are plotted such that only the water resonance is on scale.  One can see that the intensity of the water resonance dips when a saturation frequency of ~14 ppm is applied, corresponding to the resonance frequency of the –COOH and –OH protons of the salicylic acid (which appear to be in fast or intermediate exchange with one another).  The water resonance of course also dips to zero when a saturation frequency of ~4.7 ppm is used, corresponding to a simple presaturation of the water.  The right-hand panel of the figure is a plot of the integral of the water resonance as a function of saturation frequency, showing again a dip at ~14 ppm.

CEST is used in MRI to provide image contrast where a chemical exchange agent is introduced and images are collected with and without saturation of the exchange agent.  The difference provides an image enhanced by the presence of the chemical exchange agent.

Thank you to Dr. Mojmir Suchy of Prof. Adam Shuhendler’s group at the University of Ottawa for arousing my interest in the use of CEST for MRI and preparing the sample used in this post. 

Saturation Transfer and Exchange

Exchange processes that occur on the NMR time scale affect the NMR line shapes and can be studied by line shape analysis. If the exchange process is slow on the NMR time scale, one can employ EXSY or inversion transfer methods to study the exchange. An alternative to these is the saturation transfer technique. In this method, one of the slowly exchanging resonances (A) is saturated with low power CW irradiation and the effect on the intensity of the resonance of the exchange partner (B) is monitored. If there is exchange between A and B during the period of saturation some of the saturation from A will be transferred to B. The change in the intensity of B will depend on both the rate of exchange, k and the relaxation time of B, T_1B . If there is no nuclear Overhauser effects between A and B, then the rate of exchange is given by: where I_o is the intensity of B with no saturation of A, and I_∞ , is the intensity of B when A is saturated for an infinite time. The saturation transfer effect is useful for situations where the exchange is slow on the NMR time scale but faster than (or of the same order as) T_1B. An example using ³¹P NMR is illustrated in the figure below for a ruthenium phosphine complex which undergoes slow exchange between isomers with different modes of bonding. The ³¹P [¹H] NMR spectrum is shown in the upper right-hand panel of the figure. In this case, the P atoms of isomer A are chemical shift equivalent and give a singlet while those for isomer B are chemical shift nonequivalent and give an AB pattern. The spectrum of isomer B is shown in the lower panel of the figure as a function of saturation time of isomer A.



Many thanks to Carolyn Higman and Prof. Deryn Fogg for kindly allowing their data to be used in this post.