One always strives to collect high quality 2D NMR data in a short period of time. This is particularly important for samples of limited stability or perhaps for monitoring chemical reactions. High magnetic fields and cryogenically cooled NMR probes have allowed for a higher signal-to-noise-ratio for a given quantity of sample, thereby reducing data collection time as a fewer number of scans are required. Gradient enhanced 2D NMR data collection gained widespread use in the 1990s. This represented a tremendous time saving as multi-step phase cycles required for coherence selection could be reduced or eliminated as they were replaced by pulsed field gradients. Some pulse sequences which required 16 scans per increment to accommodate the necessary phase cycle could be run with a single scan for every increment with the use of pulsed field gradients, thus reducing the data collection time by a factor of 16. Now, 2D data collection with coherence selection via pulsed field gradients is considered "conventional". More recently, Non-Uniform Sampling (NUS) was introduced. Data collection with this technique samples only a limited number of increments in the t1 domain. The unsampled increments are calculated based on the sampled increments prior to Fourier transformation. The data collection time is reduced in accordance with the number of increments not sampled. Recently, Kupce and Claridge1,2 have developed a technique where multiple 2D methods are concatenated
in a single super pulse sequence employing a single relaxation delay.
They have called the technique NOAH (NMR by Ordered Acquisition using 1H detection) The time saving of the NOAH technique compared to
individually collected 2D spectra results from waiting a single
relaxation delay for all experiments rather than a single relaxation
delay for each separately acquired spectrum. The data for each spectrum
is acquired in separate memory blocks which are separated after data
collection allowing the data for each 2D method to be processed
individually. Very recently, both NUS and NOAH have been used together to further reduce data collection times3. A comparison of the time saving is shown in the figure below for a sample of sucrose in DMSO-d6 collected on a Bruker AVANCE III HD 600 NMR spectrometer equipped with a cryoprobe.
All spectra were collected with 2 scans and a 1 second recycle time. Individually, both NOAH and NUS offer a significant time saving but when used together they permit very fast, high quality data collection. A COSY, edited HSQC and HMBC can be collected in a total time of only 4 minutes and 8 seconds. Other ultra-fast techniques have been developed by others where an entire 2D spectrum is collected in less than one second.
1. Eriks Kupce and Tim D. W. Claridge. Chem. Commun. 54, 7139 (2018).
2. Eriks Kupce and Tim D. W. Claridge. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 56, 11779 (2017).
3. Maksim Mayzel, Tim D. W. Claridge and Ēriks Kupce. Bruker User Library (2018).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Hi Glenn,
Great post, as usual.
Have you been using the NOAH sequences on any RT probes by chance? Their performance on a cryoprobe is really cool, but I just wonder if NUS and NOAH with the reduced S/N of a RT probe is going to limit their usefulness.
G,
I have used NOAH om RT probes - even standard broadband RT probes with outer 1H decoupling coils. It is indeed still very useful for time saving. Of course, you have to take the loss in S/N as you would for any other 1H detected experiment on going from a cryoprobe to an RT probe. I have not used NUS or NOAH with NUS on instruments with RT probes due to software licensing issues.
Glenn
Could be please let me know, how to process the resultant NOAH NUS data sets, after separate them through 'split' command.
Anonymous,
You can use the 'splitx_au' au program provided with the original NOAH release.
Glenn
Post a Comment